Buy Property in Singapore

Buy Property in Singapore

On seeing this keyword the question arises in the mind that how one can buy property in Singapore the answer is firstly you have to appoint a property agent who is the representative of the whole process. You should be frank with him i.e. you should tell him all your needs.

Secondly, decides on the property i.e. you should decides what you need? You should not hesitate for negotiating in price and renovation because it is the long term investments don’t invest until you are fully satisfied. After deciding the property you should go for a reputed solicitor.

Then apply for lone in bank. You can secure a loan from a Singaporean bank for up to a maximum of 80% of the purchase price. The majority of foreign borrowers can secure a loan of 70% of the purchase price in Singapore Prime Districts.

On annual basis you should file for the property taxes after gaining the ownership of the property. Take note of the rental yield of the unit if you are purchasing the property as an investment. Due to desirability Prime locations like Districts 9, 10 and 11 easily weld the highest rental yields.

6 common mistakes done by the buyers

1. Investment on hearsay. On buying the property, do not rely on the facts because one should understand that the market fluctuates everyday. You have to buy that which your family need.

2. Poor location. Location of the property will depend on you. It might happen that you get blinded by the superb description by the agent.

3. Decision on what the house looks outside. It might be possible that your house is just the copy it looks in the magazines. But your decision should be based on interior too.

4. Designing over function and necessity. Depending on the need and necessity of the house one should buy the house. As it might happen that the house look grand and fashionable but the room may too small to fulfill your needs.

5. Skipping professional. To avoids unnecessary surprises and the exact condition of the whole property you have to get the help of a professional.

6. Lack of property information. These types of mistakes are done by those buyers who have no knowledge about the information technology because at this stage of time every thing is given on the internet.

Buy Sell Rent Invest In Singapore

Mindy Yong

(+65) 91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com

Jurong HDB Flat for Sales 12.09.2008

Jurong HDB Flat for Sales 12.09.2008

TYPE : [2]Rm [3]Rm [4]Rm [5]Rm [EA]Ex Apt [EM]Ex Mais [6]Rm

TNR=Tenure, DT=District, BDRM=Bedroom, AREA=Built-In, STR=Storey, Price $K=In Thousand

Price are subject to changes , please call (+65) 91002985 for lastest update

Type — 3A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 321 #02
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 2
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 3N
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 257 #04
Area — 742
Age — 20+
Bedroom — 2
Psf — 317
PRICE$ — 235000
Type — 3N
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 257 #08
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 2
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 216000
Type — 4
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 621 #09
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 327000
Type — 4
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 674A #15
Area — 989
Age — 7
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 344
PRICE$ — 340000
Type — 4A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 518 #14
Area — 1173
Age — 23
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 297
PRICE$ — 348000
Type — 4A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 612 #07
Area — 1011
Age — 08+
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 326
PRICE$ — 330000
Type — 4A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 694 #06
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 349000
Type — 4A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 728 #11
Area — 1119
Age — 18
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 4A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 748 #06
Area — 1119
Age — 18
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 246
PRICE$ — 275000
Type — 4A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 850 #04
Area — 1162
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 207
PRICE$ — 240000
Type — 4A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 938 #09
Area — 1119
Age — 19
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 219
PRICE$ — 245000
Type — 4N
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 214 #05
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 330000
Type — 5
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 228 #08
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 4
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 274C #10
Area — 1356
Age — 7
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5A
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 437 #11
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5I
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 106 #12
Area — 1291
Age — 26
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 349
PRICE$ — 450000
Type — 5I
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 111 #11
Area — 1291
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 417
PRICE$ — 538000
Type — 5I
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 662B #11
Area — 1184
Age — 6
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5I
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 663C #15
Area — 1184
Age — 8
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5I
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 757 #14
Area — 1356
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5I
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 821 #12
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 303000
Type — EA
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 278B #18
Area — 1539
Age — 10+
Bedroom — 4
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — EA
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 671C #13
Area — 1399
Age —
Bedroom — 4
Psf — 311
PRICE$ — 435000
Type — EA
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 695 #10
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 450000
Type — EM
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 216 #02
Area — 1592
Age — 16
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — EM
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 287D #06
Area — 1560
Age — 10
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — EM
District — 22
Estate — JURONG EAST, BLK 340 #02
Area — 1485
Age — 4
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 226
PRICE$ — 335000
Type — EM
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 405 #04
Area — 1623
Age — 20=
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 209
PRICE$ — 340000
Type — EM
District — 22
Estate — JURONG WEST, BLK 549 #10
Area — 1592
Age — 21
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 283
PRICE$ — 450000

Buy, Sell, Rent,Invest,In Singapore

MINDY YONG

( +65 ) 91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Choa Chu Kang HDB Flat for Sales 12.09.2008

Choa Chu Kang HDB Flat for Sales 12.09.2008

TYPE : [2]Rm [3]Rm [4]Rm [5]Rm [EA]Ex Apt [EM]Ex Mais [6]Rm

TNR=Tenure, DT=District, BDRM=Bedroom, AREA=Built-In, STR=Storey, Price $K=In Thousand

Price are subject to changes , please call (+65) 91002985 for lastest update

Type — 4
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 218 #02
Area — 1141
Age — 18
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 267
PRICE$ — 305000
Type — 4
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 244 #04
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 300000
Type — 4A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 211 #09
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 4A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 215 #08
Area — 1130
Age — 18
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 4A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 439 #07
Area — 1141
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 294
PRICE$ — 335000
Type — 4A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 610 #07
Area — 1151
Age — 12
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 288
PRICE$ — 331000
Type — 4A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 701 #08
Area — 1065
Age — 12
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 291
PRICE$ — 310000
Type — 5
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 296 #15
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 360000
Type — 5
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 617 #06
Area — 1419
Age — 12
Bedroom — 4
Psf — 291
PRICE$ — 413000
Type — 5
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 642 #02
Area — 1323
Age — 10
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 675 #05
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 430000
Type — 5A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 547 #09
Area — 1323
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 272
PRICE$ — 360000
Type — 5A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 613 #03
Area — 1408
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 313
PRICE$ — 440000
Type — 5A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 617 #02
Area — 1442
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 274
PRICE$ — 395000
Type — 5A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 619 #04
Area — 1442
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 274
PRICE$ — 395000
Type — 5A
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 785 #02
Area — 1442
Age — 05+
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — 5I
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 609 #07
Area — 1442
Age — 11+
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 291
PRICE$ — 420000
Type — 5I
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 641 #03
Area — 1323
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 333
PRICE$ — 440000
Type — 5I
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 689A #17
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 370000
Type — 5I
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 691B #15
Area — 1184
Age — 5
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 321
PRICE$ — 380000
Type — 5I
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 769 #04
Area — 1312
Age —
Bedroom — 4
Psf — 263
PRICE$ — 345000
Type — 5I
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 771 #11
Area — 1312
Age — 12
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 267
PRICE$ — 350000
Type — EA
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 525 #02
Area — 1560
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 263
PRICE$ — 410000
Type — EA
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 531 #13
Area — 0
Age — 09+
Bedroom — 3
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 368000
Type — EA
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 559 #04
Area — 1582
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 265
PRICE$ — 420000
Type — EA
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 561 #02
Area — 0
Age —
Bedroom — 4
Psf — null
PRICE$ — 390000
Type — EA
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 674A #07
Area — 1500
Age —
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 307
PRICE$ — 460000
Type — EM
District — 23
Estate — CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 604 #04
Area — 1582
Age — 12
Bedroom — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0

Buy, Sell, Rent,Invest,In Singapore

MINDY YONG

( +65 ) 91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Mulberry Tree Duplex Penthouses For Sale District 11

Mulberry Tree Duplex Penthouses For Sale District 11 12.09.2008

Mulberry Tree @ Novena VicinityFreehold Boutique Retro ProjectLess than 5 minutes stroll to Novena Square, Novena MRT etc etc ….

Type PHA (2 bedroom, 118 sqm)
Type PHB (2 bedroom, 118 sqm)
Type PHD (3 bedroom, 126 sqm)
Type PHE (2 bedroom, 101 sqm)
Type PHF (2 bedroom, 101 sqm)
Type PHG (3 bedroom, 126 sqm)

Buy, Sell, Rent,invest, In Singapore

MINDY YONG

( +65 ) 91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Singapore Woodlands jams: New rules to kick in next week

Singapore Woodlands jams: New rules to kick in next week

Move to divert traffic follows complaints from residents and merchants

By Chong Chee Kin

IT TAKES almost 30 minutes for Mr Chung See Fook to drive the 100m from the carpark near the food centre in Woodlands Town Centre to the Bukit Timah Expressway in the evening.
That is because the Woodlands resident has to battle his way through bumper-to-bumper traffic bound for the Woodlands Checkpoint.

WOES AND WISH

‘It’s very frustrating when you want to travel to town and it takes a long time just to get out of the jam. It makes you want to stay in. Hopefully, with fewer cars in the area, we’d see some improvement.’

Housewife Mary Low, 44, a Woodlands resident

‘It is even more worrying for the children living in the area, who get back late and exhausted from school,’ he said.

To ease the congestion woes, the authorities announced yesterday that traffic will be diverted from the neighbourhood beginning next week.

The move comes following complaints from Woodlands Town Centre residents and merchants, who said traffic headed for the checkpoint has snarled roads and driven shoppers away from the area.

During peak hours, especially in the evening, the jam can stretch over 4km, all the way to Kranji.

The Land Transport Authority, Traffic Police, and Immigration and Checkpoints Authority said new restrictions will kick in at 4pm on Monday.

During peak hours, only public and school buses will be allowed to turn right from Woodlands Centre Road towards the Woodlands Checkpoint.

This means that from Mondays to Fridays, between 4pm and 10pm, and on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays between 10am and 10pm, cars are forbidden from using the road to get to the checkpoint. The road is one of several routes to the checkpoint. Lorries and motorcycles are not allowed to turn right from the road at all.

Deputy Superintendent Daniel Cheng, commanding officer of the Traffic Police’s patrol unit, said the diversions are part of a three-month trial to see if the situation improves.

‘The scheme is expected to benefit the residents in the Woodlands area, as well as those taking public transport and motorists going into the area,’ he said.

Traffic signs will be put up to inform motorists of the changes, and police officers will be stationed alongside the roads around the town centre to guide them, he added.

Mr Woon Teck Beng, 66, who runs a shop selling clothes in the town centre, said the diversion cannot come soon enough. His business has plunged by 30per cent because of the jams, he said.

‘People are not coming into the area to shop any more. The roads are filled with cars from 11am to 10pm over the weekends, especially on Fridays, but no one is patronising the shops,’ he said.

Grassroots leader Maszenan Abdul Majit said the jams prevent students from the nearby schools, such as Fuchun Primary and Marsiling Primary, from getting home till late in the evening.

‘The traffic can be so bad sometimes that the public buses can’t even get into the neighbourhood as it would take them too long to finish their routes,’ he said.

Mr Richard Wong, a senior executive with SMRT Buses, said when the congestion builds up, buses plying Woodlands Town Centre also have to be diverted.

Traffic surveys will be conducted to see if the changes reduce congestion.

Residents like housewife Mary Low, 44, hope the diversion would improve matters. ‘It’s very frustrating when you want to travel to town and it takes a long time just to get out of the jam. It makes you want to stay in. Hopefully, with fewer cars in the area, we’d see some improvement,’ she said.

Source : Straits Times - 12 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Malaysia Anwar’s target MPs flying home tomorrow

Malaysia Anwar’s target MPs flying home tomorrow

Their return dampens speculation that the trip was a ploy to keep potential defectors away

By Ong Hwee Hwee, Taiwan Correspondent

Malaysian Members of Parliament on a visit to Taiwan.

TAIPEI: The four dozen Malaysian MPs who are on an ‘agriculture’ tour of Taiwan will officially end their trip tomorrow, and some of them had already left for home, said lawmaker Tiong King Sing, who organised the trip.
Their return would blunt any excuse by opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim if he is not able to deliver on his promise to topple the government through cross- overs by Tuesday because some of the potential defector MPs were in Taiwan.

As the deadline looms, four leaders from Datuk Seri Anwar’s Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) are expected to travel to Taiwan today to meet the MPs, said party strategist Saifuddin Nasution.

Datuk Seri Tiong, chairman of the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) Backbenchers Club, said: ‘Officially, our tour finishes on Sept 13. In fact, about five to six MPs had already gone back on Wednesday.’

‘So there is still time to Sept 16,’ he told The Straits Times yesterday in an interview.

However, he was quick to add: ‘But I cannot rule out that some of them may want to extend their stay by one or two days.’

But he said he did not know about any MPs making such plans, even though personally he is planning a private trip to China and possibly Vietnam before heading home.

Mr Anwar has promised to take over the Malaysian government by his self-imposed deadline of Sept 16, although PKR officials yesterday acknowledged that they might not be able to make it by that date.

The MPs, who arrived in Taiwan on Monday, were earlier scheduled to return to Malaysia around Sept 17.

The hastily arranged tour during the Muslim fasting month has been panned by the opposition as a panic reaction of a government unsure of the loyalty of its MPs.

Nearly half of the backbenchers hail from Sabah and Sarawak - the states with a clutch of MPs rumoured to be considering defecting to the opposition.

Taiwan’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Henry Chen said he was not aware of any impending visit by Mr Anwar or his party officials.

‘There is no need for them to inform us because Malaysians travelling to Taiwan are granted landing visas,’ he told The Straits Times.

Mr Anwar has claimed that he has made tacit pacts with dozens of lawmakers who could potentially join his camp.

Asked about PKR’s claim that its officials had set up meetings with the MPs, Mr Tiong said the lawmakers could decide for themselves whether to meet them.

‘Can the MPs meet them? Why not? They have their own passports with them.’

But BN Backbenchers Club deputy chairman Datuk Bung Mokhtar Radin said the allegations that some of the MPs were considering Mr Anwar’s offer were baseless.

Over the past days, the MPs have visited Taiwan’s agricultural counties such as Ilan in the north and Pingtung in the south.

As part of the tour, they visited a leisure farm in Ilan and learnt about the cultivation technology for tropical fruits at the National Ping Tung University of Science and Technology, a top-notch agricultural school in Taiwan.

The MPs headed back north to Taipei yesterday after visiting southern Kaohsiung earlier in the day.

They are expected to spend the remaining days meeting agricultural officials in the capital.

Alliance admits Sept 16 takeover unlikely
THE Pakatan Rakyat (PR) opposition alliance admitted for the first time yesterday that the takeover of the federal government is not likely by the Sept 16 deadline.
The three-party alliance said in a joint statement that it believes the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) ‘would be replaced within a short time’.

‘Pakatan Rakyat is confident of getting a sufficient number of MPs to have a majority in Parliament to allow the formation of a new government.

‘But the actual date of forming the government might be deferred from Sept 16 as planned earlier because a number of MPs were forced to go to Taiwan,’ the statement said. It was posted in Malay on the blog of veteran politician Lim Kit Siang of the Democratic Action Party (DAP).

The other two members of the PR alliance are opposition chief Anwar Ibrahim’s Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS).

The statement was signed by PKR secretary-general Salehuddin Hashim, DAP political education director Loke Siew Fook and PAS secretary-general Kamarudin Jaffar.

BN has 140 MPs and the opposition 82. Mr Anwar needs at least 30 defectors to topple the ruling coalition.

REME AHMAD

Source : Straits Times - 12 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Thailand Samak accepts his party’s nomination

Thailand Samak accepts his party’s nomination

Coalition partners have some reservations about his return

BANGKOK: Thailand’s ruling People Power Party (PPP) yesterday nominated leader Samak Sundaravej to return as prime minister, despite fears that such a move could intensify the political deadlock in the country and the misgivings of some of its partners in the ruling coalition.
Protesters occupying Government House - the seat of national government in Bangkok - have said that they would not accept anyone from the PPP as prime minister, least of all Mr Samak.

The Thai army issued a statement shortly after the announcement, urging both sides to compromise, and said the government should lift a state of emergency imposed across the capital 10 days ago.

But the ruling PPP said that Mr Samak had accepted its nomination, just two days after the Constitutional Court stripped him of his office over his hosting of TV cooking shows.

‘Samak has accepted his nomination for prime minister,’ PPP spokesman Suthin Klangsang said.

‘Samak said he is confident that Parliament will find him fit for office, and that he is happy to accept the post,’ the spokesman added.

But it appeared that his apparent re-nomination was not wholeheartedly endorsed by the five other parties in the coalition, leaving the country perhaps in yet another political deadlock.

Some of the partners said that they accepted the PPP’s right to nominate Mr Samak, but did not necessarily agree with the choice.

‘We honour the core party’s nomination, but we think the new prime minister should be someone who can help resolve the political crisis,’ Mr Somsak Prisana-Anantakul of the Chart Thai Party, the second-largest in the coalition, told a joint news conference by representatives of all six parties.

Many in the coalition are apparently pushing for someone capable of reducing political tensions with the People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD), whose protesters have occupied Government House for more than two weeks.

‘Our stand remains the same, we will not accept Samak or anyone proposed from the PPP, because the party lacks legitimacy,’ said media mogul and protest leader Sondhi Limthongkul.

‘They violated the Constitution and lack morals,’ he was quoted as saying.

Urging compromise, the army in its statement warned that the state of emergency was hurting confidence in Thailand’s economy.

Mr Samak imposed the state of emergency last week after clashes between pro- and anti-government demonstrators in the capital that left one government supporter dead and dozens of people injured.

‘The Thai army believes that to maintain the state of emergency will do more harm than good,’ the army said. ‘If the state of emergency is lifted soon, that would be positive.’

It added: ‘The army is ready to support the police in maintaining law and order.’

The army’s warning about the fallout to the economy was borne out by figures which showed consumer confidence plummeting last month to its lowest level this year. Finance Minister Surapong Suebwonglee has also said that this was one reason why the government’s economic growth target would be missed. It had forecast 5 to 6 per cent for this year.

The stock market turned lower in the afternoon after news of Mr Samak’s nomination, ending down 1.33 per cent. It has fallen around 25 per cent since the street protests began in late May.

The court ruling against 73-year-old Samak removed him from office but did not ban him from returning.

The PPP, which has almost an outright majority in Parliament with 233 of the 480 seats, has called the Chamber into special session today to vote for a new prime minister.

But in Thailand’s ever-fluctuating politics, doubts remained that Mr Samak would be the final choice for the nation’s top office.

About an hour after the announcement of his re-nomination, there was word that negotiations were continuing to get someone else nominated.

‘We are still having internal discussions. It can change at the last minute,’ said acting Prime Minister Somchai Wongsawat.

REUTERS, ASSOCIATED PRESS, AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

Source : Straits Times - 12 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Singapore Govternment suing Dow Jones paper for contempt of court

Singapore Govternment suing Dow Jones paper for contempt of court

A-G’s Chambers takes issue with 3 articles in Wall Street Journal Asia

By Sue-Ann Chia

THE Singapore Government is taking the Wall Street Journal Asia (WSJA) newspapers and its editors to court, accusing them of contempt of court.
It alleges that three articles the WSJA had published in June and July ‘impugn the impartiality, integrity and independence of the Singapore Judiciary’.

This statement was posted on the website of the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) yesterday when it got approval from the High Court to start legal proceedings.

Two of the articles are the newspaper’s editorials, while the third is a letter by Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan.

Those who will face the charge of contempt of court are: Dow Jones Publishing (Asia), which owns and publishes WSJA; Mr Daniel Hertzberg, editor, international of WSJA; and WSJA managing editor Christine Glancey.

When contacted last night, a Dow Jones spokesman, speaking for all of them, declined to comment.

All three articles allege the Singapore Judiciary is not independent, the AGC said in its online statement.

‘It is further insinuated that the Singapore Judiciary is biased and lacks integrity. These allegations and insinuations in these items are unwarranted,’ it added.

One of the editorials examined the lack of democracy in Singapore and included an account of the exchange in court between Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and SDP chief Chee Soon Juan.

The hearing in May was to assess defamation damages Dr Chee, his sister and the SDP had to pay Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and MM Lee.

The other editorial was on the Singapore Judiciary, following a report by the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute in July. The 72-page report alleges executive interference in the Judiciary.

In its online statement, the AGC also said: ‘This case is not about freedom of expression. It is about the rule of law.’

The courts, it added, play a vital role in good governance. Hence, an ‘unwarranted attack’ against the Judiciary is an ‘assault on the rule of law in Singapore’.

‘It is a fundamental principle of the administration of justice and rule of law that disappointed litigants or persons with a particular philosophy or agenda should not undermine the authority of the courts.

‘This is completely against the public interest. Words or actions that undermine the authority of the court or judges amount to contempt of court,’ it said.

The AGC also pointed out that the articles were published at a time when the Far Eastern Economic Review, a sister publication of the WSJA, is being sued for defamation by PM Lee and MM Lee.

It could not be confirmed yesterday whether Dow Jones had received notice of the legal suit.

Getting the High Court’s approval to start contempt proceedings is the first of a two-stage process.

Once the nod is given, as it was yesterday at a closed-door session, the Attorney-General will take the next step.

The other parties will be officially notified of the lawsuit and a hearing date will be set for both sides to present their arguments in open court.

What’s in the three articles
June 26, 2008: ‘Democracy In Singapore’
This editorial examined the practice of democracy in Singapore and said political dissent is not among the freedoms that citizens enjoy.

It also referred to two court cases.

One was the hearing in May to assess defamation damages that Singapore Democratic Party chief Chee Soon Juan and others had to pay Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.

It cited exchanges at the hearing between MM Lee and Dr Chee.

The other case was that of former Workers’ Party member Gopalan Nair who was arrested and charged with insulting a judge.

July 9, 2008: ‘Produce The Transcript, Show The Truth’
This was a letter by SDP chief Chee Soon Juan responding to Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew’s press secretary who had replied to the above editorial.

In his letter, Dr Chee challenged Madam Yeong Yoon Ying, Mr Lee’s press secretary, to produce court transcripts showing that he had called Singapore leaders ‘murderers, robbers, child molesters and rapists’.

Citing his own experiences of being arrested, he disagreed with Madam Yeong’s statement: ‘Singapore upholds free speech’.

July 15, 2008: ‘Judging Singapore’s Judiciary’
The editorial looked at the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute report in July, which gave an assessment of the Singapore Judiciary.

It referred to the report’s allegations about the Judiciary’s apparent lack of independence, especially in cases involving the ruling People’s Action Party, and called the 72-page report a ‘good primer’ on Singapore’s use of defamation suits against opposition politicians and the foreign press.

Source : Straits Times - 12 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Why now is a better time Political system changes

Why now is a better time Political system changes

Political system changes are best made soon, for demographic reasons

By Chua Mui Hoong, Senior Writer

MID-TERMS are always good times for genuine policy reforms. It has been 28 months since the May 2006 General Election. Assuming the next elections are due by April 2011, it is nearly midway through the electoral cycle.
Changes to the political system, or painful reforms to the socio-economic landscape, are better tackled in the coming months, sooner rather than later, to avoid a backlash in the next polls.

The last years have seen tremendous social and economic policy changes: higher road charges, changes to the Central Provident Fund, pro-natality measures, and pro-immigration measures.

What is next? Political reform.

The three top political leaders in Singapore have recently spoken about the need for the political system here to ‘evolve’ to meet the changing demands of a new electorate.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his National Day Rally speech acknowledged the need to liberalise the political system, flagging changes which allow outdoor demonstrations at Speakers’ Corner, and rules on e-campaigning.

Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said in a recent e-mail interview that among the issues he worries about for Singapore, is how the political system will evolve. That it must evolve, he readily acknowledged in earlier statements made in July.

Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong has also said that tweaks to the political system are necessary.

‘Whatever the refinements we may make to our political system down the road, some core principles must remain the same,’ he noted.

‘One, any changes must be fair to all parties and give them an equal chance to contest and win; two, they must not lead to democratic chaos and politics of division; and three, they must not put Singapore’s unity and harmony, growth and prosperity and long-term interests at risk.’

The above are sound principles to guide political evolution: fair play; avoiding divisiveness; and not risking long-term harmony.

It is creditable that the People’s Action Party is choosing this time - when there is still a respectable two-thirds electoral support for it as seen at the last polls, when there is political stability, and social harmony - when there is no discernible crisis or clear threat to its position, to institute political reform. But then this party has perfected, since its election in 1959, the art of instrumental and incremental reform that keeps itself relevant to voters - or it would have risked obsolescence long ago.

There is talk about ‘tweaks’ to the system, which suggests piecemeal, incremental change. This would be a pity, because the time is ripe for a more strategic attempt at political reform according to the three principles outlined by SM Goh above.

Why is this a good time? I would say, for demographic reasons.

In the May 2006 GE, those born after 1965 made up 40 per cent of the electorate. The post-Independence generation will likely form the majority in the next.

The median age today is about 37. The median voter today is someone old enough to understand the conservatism and values-laced rhetoric of the pioneering generation, but young enough to sympathise with the aspirations of a brave new world from those in their 20s.

In two or three GEs’ time, the median voter will be someone in his 20s today - who grew up with the Net and could probablymanoeuvre the mouse before he could navigate a spoon to his baby lips, who may have little patience with the values of the pioneering generation, and who may value radical changes more than incremental ‘tweaks’.

Political changes would be better received by today’s median 37-year-old voter, than by the one who turns 37 in 2018.

What form should reform take?

Going by the pronouncements of the PAP’s own leaders, one clear motivation for change is to keep abreast of the changing expectations of the electorate. SM Goh hit the nail on the head when he said that Singapore voters want a PAP Government but also more opposition voices.

By that yardstick, reform is meaningful only if it gives voters what they have repeatedly signalled they want: an elected opposition.

Past attempts to introduce nominated or also-ran opposition (via the Nominated MP and Non-Constituency MP schemes) arrested the speed of the tide towards the opposition, but did not succeed in reversing it, given the consistent one-third opposition voting bloc.

The PAP can, if it wishes to, introduce changes that remove obstacles and give opposition parties ‘an equal chance to contest and win’, as SM Goh put it.

Just what those obstacles are, ask any opposition party leader and the usual litany of complaints will surface: whimsical changes to electoral boundaries perceived to benefit the PAP; insufficient campaign time and exposure in the mainstream media; and PAP leaders’ use of the bully pulpit to run down opposition candidates.

The way I see it, the Government has been ahead of the curve of majority opinion in acting decisively in relaxing rules to allow outdoor protests at Speakers’ Corner and indicating it would relax rules on political films and online campaigning during elections.

Similarly, it can choose to introduce political changes which will reduce the barriers of entry for the opposition, ahead of any crisis situation.

Just what could be the content of such reforms, is a complicated subject for another piece. Given Singapore’s creativity and pragmatism, seen in the way it introduced the Group Representation Constituency and NMP concepts, there is no doubt that the Republic can come up with suitable reforms, if the changes adhere to SM Goh’s objective of ensuring that parties have an ‘equal chance to contest’.

There is a window of opportunity now for change to take place and work its way through the political system.

Change creates some disequilibrium - which is best absorbed in good times, and when the majority of the electorate are tempered folk, who understand Singapore’s unique position, who desire change but value stability and do not want radical transformation.

Otherwise, whatever changes are put in place risk being seen as too little, too late, by an impatient younger electorate.

Source : Straits Times - 12 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )

Watermark For Sale Apartment Condo District 09 12.09.2008

Watermark For Sale Apartment Condo District 09 12.09.2008

TY : [C]ondo [D]uplex [H]iRise [L]oRise [T]ownHse [P]enthse [W]alkUp [M]asionette

TNR=Tenure, DT=District, BDRM=Bedroom, AREA=Built-In, STR=Storey, Price $K=In Thousand

Price are subject to changes , please call (+65) 91002985 for lastest update

Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BKL 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1733
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1554
PRICE$ — 2693080
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1076
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1348
PRICE$ — 1450000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 926
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1582
Age — 1
Room — 3
Psf — 1454
PRICE$ — 2300000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 904
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1580
PRICE$ — 1428320
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1076
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 1936800
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 915
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1650
PRICE$ — 1509750
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 914
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 1645200
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1076
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1626
PRICE$ — 1750000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1861
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1343
PRICE$ — 2500000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1915
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1555
PRICE$ — 2978000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1915
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1500
PRICE$ — 2873000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1076
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1599
PRICE$ — 1720000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 936
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1496
PRICE$ — 1400000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 890
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1708
PRICE$ — 1520000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1862
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1950
PRICE$ — 3630900
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1076
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 1937000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1055
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 1899000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 914
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 1
Tenure — FH
Area — 1076
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1700
PRICE$ — 1829200
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1543
PRICE$ — 1976580
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1323
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1631
PRICE$ — 2158070
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 2383000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1345
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1703
PRICE$ — 2290000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1733
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1558
PRICE$ — 2700000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1647
PRICE$ — 2180000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1345
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1755
PRICE$ — 2360000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1345
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1700
PRICE$ — 2286500
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1712
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 2021
PRICE$ — 3460000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1684
PRICE$ — 2230000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1733
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1650
PRICE$ — 2860000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1601
PRICE$ — 2120000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1733
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1760
PRICE$ — 3050000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — 30
Room — 3
Psf — 1813
PRICE$ — 2400000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1733
Age — BN
Room — 4.3
Psf — 1847
PRICE$ — 3200000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1650
PRICE$ — 2184600
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1819
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1732
PRICE$ — 3150000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1798
PRICE$ — 2380000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1733
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1731
PRICE$ — 3000000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 904
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1600
PRICE$ — 2050000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1737
PRICE$ — 2300000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 936
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1795
PRICE$ — 1680000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1522
PRICE$ — 1950000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1546
PRICE$ — 1980000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1847
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1516
PRICE$ — 2800000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1302
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1498
PRICE$ — 1950000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 947
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1650
PRICE$ — 1562550
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 894
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1500
PRICE$ — 1341000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1750
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1714
PRICE$ — 3000000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1650
PRICE$ — 2184800
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1300
PRICE$ — 1721200
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1699
PRICE$ — 2250000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1733
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1350
PRICE$ — 2339550
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 904
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1680
PRICE$ — 1518720
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1862
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1500
PRICE$ — 2793000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 2305800
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — 999
Area — 1281
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1600
PRICE$ — 2050000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1730
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1600
PRICE$ — 2768000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1600
PRICE$ — 2118400
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1281
Age — 1
Room — 3
Psf — 1575
PRICE$ — 2017570
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1302
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1613
PRICE$ — 2100000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1565
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 0
PRICE$ — 0
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 1324
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1473
PRICE$ — 1950000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 947
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1700
PRICE$ — 1609900
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 3
Tenure — FH
Area — 904
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1680
PRICE$ — 1518720
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1033
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 1859400
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1690
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1479
PRICE$ — 2500000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1999
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1600
PRICE$ — 3198400
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1033
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1500
PRICE$ — 1550000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1862
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1611
PRICE$ — 2999990
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1356
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1364
PRICE$ — 1850000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1033
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1723
PRICE$ — 1780000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1033
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1742
PRICE$ — 1800000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1162
Age — BN
Room — 3
Psf — 1618
PRICE$ — 1880000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 980
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 1764000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 915
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1650
PRICE$ — 1509750
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 927
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1726
PRICE$ — 1600000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1872
Age — BN
Room — 4
Psf — 1603
PRICE$ — 3000000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 5
Tenure — FH
Area — 1033
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1859
PRICE$ — 1920000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 7
Tenure — FH
Area — 1259
Age — 1
Room — 2
Psf — 1810
PRICE$ — 2278790
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 7
Tenure — FH
Area — 1022
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1761
PRICE$ — 1800000
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 7
Tenure — FH
Area — 1141
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 2053800
Type — C
District — 9
Street — WATERMARK @ ROBERTSON QUAY, BLK 7
Tenure — FH
Area — 936
Age — BN
Room — 2
Psf — 1800
PRICE$ — 1684800

Buy, Sell, Rent,invest, In Singapore

MINDY YONG

( +65 ) 91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com ( email me )