Europe’s fumbling into new Cold War

Europe’s fumbling into new Cold War

By Jonathan Eyal, ST Europe Bureau

FOR the first time in its history, the European Union’s heads of government are meeting today to discuss a single foreign policy issue: relations with Russia.
Usually, EU summits are highly scripted affairs, in which diplomatic showmanship invariably counts for more than substance. Not today, however. For the recent war between Russia and Georgia has plunged Europe into its biggest security crisis in decades.

Simply put, the continent can either maintain its unity by containing Russia with a newer version of the Cold War, or avoid a confrontation with Moscow, only to see the Union unravel. Sadly, the one option which everyone would have preferred - that of remaining engaged with the Russians while maintaining European unity - is no longer achievable.

The Europeans claim, with some justification, that they should not be blamed for the outbreak of the war between Georgia and Russia. It was the United States - and not Europe - which pushed for Georgia’s entry into Nato over Russia’s strenuous objections.

Furthermore, while the Europeans constantly urged moderation, the Americans supplied Georgia with weapons. Washington did not encourage Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili to launch his disastrous attack last month, but it stands guilty of sending wrong messages: It led Georgia into believing that it could count on US military support when none was forthcoming, and it cornered Russia.

Yet the Europeans are not just innocent bystanders in this drama. There were plenty of opportunities to tackle the problem of Georgia’s Russian-dominated separatist enclaves. However, Europe did next to nothing: Georgia’s troubles were classified as ‘frozen conflicts’, supposedly insoluble issues best left to rot in the fridge. The Georgians went to war because they felt they had nothing left to lose. European inaction was a contributing factor to the disaster.

To make matters worse, earlier this year some key European states recognised the unilateral declaration of independence of Kosovo, a breakaway province of Serbia. Warnings that this act would give Russia the justification for doing the same in Georgia were brushed aside as ’simply irrelevant’.

Unsurprisingly, however, Moscow followed Europe’s example by extending its recognition to the Georgian enclave. What’s sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose. So the Europeans are now in the ridiculous position of denouncing Russia’s actions while appealing to the world to recognise Kosovo. Coherence was never Europe’s strongest asset.

In theory, the crisis can still be contained. After all, Georgia is a faraway country; the stupidity of its leaders should not be allowed to sour Europe’s broader relations with Russia.

But even those who believe this argument acknowledge that matters have gone too far, and that doing nothing about Georgia is just about the worst possible alternative.

Strategic considerations come first. Throughout the former Soviet Union, there are plenty of other Russian minorities which will now be emboldened to separate from their countries. Matters are particularly grave in Ukraine - Europe’s second biggest country - where a third of the population is ethnic Russian; and in Moldova, where an independent enclave already exists.

Furthermore, if Russian actions in Georgia go unpunished, a cardinal principle of international law - the sanctity of borders - will be discredited. So, despite its friendly relations with Russia, China has flatly refused to sanction Moscow’s behaviour.

But the biggest problem for Europe is that the Georgian crisis has shattered the EU’s delicate internal balance. In the past five years, the EU has absorbed no fewer than 10 new member states from the former communist bloc. All are fearful of Russia, their old colonial master. But all were told they should shut up and do as they are told by the ‘big boys’ in the EU - Germany, France and Britain.

So while the Russians launched last year a massive cyber-attack against one East European country, imposed an economic embargo on another and periodically cut off oil supplies to three others, the EU pretended not to notice. Indeed, Germany - which relies most on Russian energy supplies - argued for more engagement with Moscow.

This strategy of ignoring the East Europeans in order to keep good relations with Russia may have made sense. But it was already crumbling well before the Russian-Georgia war erupted.

Frustrated with their inability to be heard, the East Europeans turned to the US. Poland and the Czech Republic recently accepted the stationing of American missiles on their soil, in part to get the security guarantee which they were refused from the rest of the EU.

Now that Russian defiance has come into the open, the ability of West European governments to silence their East European counterparts has vanished.

At today’s summit, Germany, Italy and France will do their best to deflect East European demands for economic sanctions against Russia. The outcome will, therefore, be a stalemate. The EU will curtail its official links with Russia, and may postpone negotiations on a new trade agreement with Moscow, but it will hold the door open to further dialogue.

Yet Europe’s predicament is only just beginning. The East Europeans, now supported by Britain and the Scandinavian countries, will not rest until the EU adopts tougher measures against Moscow. And if Germany continues to resist such measures, the EU will be paralysed.

As has often been the case in recent European history, the dispute may ultimately be settled by Russia’s own amazing knack to shoot itself in the foot by going too far.

During the past month, the Germans have pleaded with the Russians to withdraw their troops from Georgia. They didn’t. Germany then warned Moscow not to recognise the Russian enclaves in Georgia. Russia did. And now, Moscow is hinting that it is about to absorb the ‘independent’ enclaves into Russia proper.

Step by step, Russia’s actions and the fears of Eastern Europe are tearing apart existing security arrangements. The future now belongs to the hard-liners from both sides, to those who advocate containment and confrontation.

The leaders who gather in Brussels for their summit today will try their best to ignore this reality. But they can no longer stop Europe from fumbling into a new Cold War.

Source : Straits Times - 01 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com

Singapore JTC to give more specific property info

Singapore JTC to give more specific property info

MARKET players can better decide which projects they want to go for when industrial landlord JTC Corporation offers more supply information starting in the first half of next year.
This will give developers a better idea of which businesses will find a certain space appropriate, said Mr Heah Soon Poh, director of the specialised parks development group at JTC Corporation.

Currently, the Urban Redevelopment Authority provides generic supply and demand information to the public through its quarterly reports.

JTC plans to give more details on the types of industrial properties and industry-specific demand.

‘This will help to better match available supply with pipeline demand,’ added Mr Heah.

He explained: ‘We are putting out more details as a result of feedback from private developers.’

JTC holds regular discussion sessions with developers to update them on coming launches and seek feedback about JTC initiatives.

‘We are planning to have more of these engagement sessions at regular intervals in the future,’ Mr Heah said.

Source : Straits Times - 01 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com

Have EPL-style table as guide for investors - Singapore

Have EPL-style table as guide for investors - Singapore

With 1,400 firms listed on SGX, those with no compelling story face obscurity

By Lee Su Shyan , ASSISTANT MONEY EDITOR

FOR those thinking of going public, the dull market is one hurdle to contend with. But there is another issue - how to stand out in a sea of faces.
There are now nearly 1,400 companies listed on the Singapore Exchange, including those on the secondary board Catalist. That is a big jump from the some 600 companies listed on the SGX in 2003.

Take the recent deadline for companies - with a financial year-end of June30 - to release their results.

By last Friday, more than 70 companies had released their results on the SGX website, but only a fraction of these received more than a mere mention in the press.

When it comes to the more popular Dec31 year-end, there are hundreds of companies’ results flooding the SGX website.

The deadline is 60 days after Dec 31, which usually works out to March 1.

A few companies manage to get their results out after the first couple of weeks in January and then the deluge of results begins, building up to a crescendo on the last day.

While loss-making companies are happy to hide their embarrassment in a crowd of similar companies showing red ink, there are many companies which fret that they get nary a mention.

Usually, only the components of the Straits Times Index - the blue chips - get their fair share of coverage. A range of mid-cap companies will also get featured.

But there are many left out in the cold.

Various financial portals do offer investor relations services to help these companies reach out to shareholders and potential investors.

The SGX has also started a research scheme, where companies pay a fee and a securities house will issue a research report on the company.

There are now various indexes, such as the Small Cap Index as well as the China Index, to introduce more trading excitement into the market.

But despite all these efforts, there remain a large mass of companies whose developments are tracked by only a small handful of shareholders.

And this is unlikely to change in these weak markets where investors are keeping a tight grip on their funds and are interested only in blue chips.

In the long term, what will help is if Singapore manages to attract better-quality and larger listings, something that the SGX is committed to. At the same time, it also seems to be encouraging smaller and weaker companies to go private.

For example, last week, it told companies whose shares are suspended that if they cannot find a strong business proposition, they should stop wasting shareholders’ time and just delist.

This is one way of culling the weaker companies from the list. For example, Automated Touchstone Machines will be delisted today. It asked for additional time to evaluate a potential business proposal but the SGX rejected its request.

There are also another 11 companies on the SGX watchlist. These too, if they don’t stop making losses, or don’t have enough of a market following and market capitalisation, will be delisted after two years.

So for those eyeing a listing, think twice if you do not have a compelling story. It is all too likely that you will enjoy a brief flash of investor interest before you fall into obscurity.

And what of the remaining companies, a good majority of which remain in a no-man’s land currently?

They need to strive to have more of a corporate story, to grow bigger. That is usually easier said than done, given the dire state of the market and the credit crunch.

That is why more comparison analysis among various companies in the same sector should be performed.

Analysts recommend whether a particular stock should be bought, held or sold. They may also give a few top picks in that particular sector.

But at the end of the day, an investor who wants to invest, say $10,000, will want to know whether this particular stock is better than another.

A guide in terms of profits or turnover or dividend yield would at least be a starting point, even if it is a tad simplistic.

One way would be a table or ranking of the companies in that space. Think of it as a football league table, but for stocks instead.

We know which are the Premier League clubs and those heading for relegation. Where we need more help with is telling the second division from the third.

Source : Straits Times - 01 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com

Silver lining in Gao Ning case

Silver lining in Gao Ning case

STTA chief’s outburst badly timed, but she did spot what needed fixing

By Marc Lim, Sports Correspondent

THE saga that gripped a nation and took the gloss off Singapore’s greatest sporting achievement in almost half a century is over.
Though there are some who are still sore about the events that overshadowed Singapore’s first Olympic medal in 48 years, it is clear that most are willing to put the events of last week behind them and move on.

Like the 300 Team Singapore fans who cheered the women’s table tennis team and officials at the Ang Mo Kio Hub on Saturday morning.

Like paddlers Li Jiawei, Feng Tianwei and Wang Yuegu, who returned from Beijing sullen and looking anything like Olympic medal winners, but wore smiles galore on Saturday.

It was encouraging to see officials, players and coaches acting as one, suggesting that perhaps, all is well again.

But it bears reminding that while Singapore Table Tennis Association (STTA) president Lee Bee Wah was justifiably lambasted for her outburst, some good did come out of it.

For her comments brought into the open questions about unfair coaching practices, favouritism and poor management.

Her timing, as Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports Vivian Balakrishnan put it last Friday night, might have been ill-conceived, but Ms Lee clearly saw things in the STTA that needed fixing - and fast.

The ‘Gao Ning incident’ - the player was forced to play a game on the biggest stage in sport without a coach by his side, and, suitably rattled by this, proceeded to go meekly into the long night against a player ranked much lower than him - helped bring to light practices in the team which were unhealthy.

It was why team manager Antony Lee and head coach Liu Guodong - as officials in charge of the team - were singled out by Ms Lee for blame.

While there may have been a good reason for the absent coach - he was sick - there seems to be enough evidence to suggest that the men do have it worse.

Gao had revealed to The Straits Times that at the Beijing Olympics, members of the women’s team were given a room each, while he had to bunk in with teammate Cai Xiaoli and another coach.

Gao also complained about being used as a sparring partner for the women, a situation which Singapore’s Sportsman of the Year perhaps felt was beneath him.

Yet coach Liu made no bones of the fact that he had focused all his resources on the women’s team, as they were the only ones with a realistic medal chance.

But while he may have been right to channel his energies towards winning a medal, the alleged favouring of the women is not becoming of a head coach.

To her credit, Ms Lee was quick to realise this. A new men’s coach will be brought in to ensure that the men’s team get equal footing in the association.

But that is just one aspect of the table tennis team that has been fixed.

Others bear looking into.

Much attention has been focused on the men’s team. But not all is rosy with the women’s team either.

When China’s CCTV invited the Singapore women for an interview shortly after their silver-medal feat in Beijing, for instance, only Liu, Li and Feng were involved.

Wang, the third member of the team, was apparently not informed about the interview and was left out.

This apparent rift between Wang - Singapore’s second-highest ranked woman player at No. 7 - and the team has been simmering for some time now.

There have been allegations that coach Liu had favoured Li, and Wang spoke out against it.

In March, friction within the team was allegedly so bad that Wang was made to train alone.

And just last week, Wang was quoted in the media as saying that team manager Lee was ‘unfair’, although she declined to elaborate.

It is such disharmony that Ms Lee must weed out - now.

For over $4 million - from the Singapore Sports Council and the Singapore National Olympic Council-initiated Project 0812 - has been invested in the sport over the last year.

With that kind of money involved, improvement will not only be expected, but it will also be demanded.

Expectations will be higher by the time the London 2012 Olympics roll around.

Singaporeans were as much relieved as they were happy when our ping-pong girls ended the Olympic drought.

They will want more at the next Olympics and will be keeping an eye on the sport, given the events of the past week.

Singaporeans have shown that while the silver medal brought a nation together in celebration, a crisis can also draw unified outrage.

Singaporeans blogged, posted Internet threads, started an online petition and wrote letters. The Straits Times received over 200 letters and e-mails 24 hours after The Sunday Times broke the story that team manager Lee was no longer needed by the STTA.

How wonderful to see Singaporeans so passionate about sport - a feeling not often seen in this post-Malaysia Cup era.

Singaporeans fought, argued and exchanged harsh words. Opinions may have differed, but in the end, there was always only one goal: to better Singapore sports.

How Ms Lee, as president of Singapore’s most successful national sports association in recent years, takes the sport forward will come under much scrutiny.

She may have been wrong to dampen the celebrations, but now that she has apologised, it is time to give her the benefit of the doubt and allow her to run the STTA as she deems fit.

She has already shown that she will not accept mediocrity, and is not afraid to shake things up.

By bringing things out into the open and exposing what she felt were wrong practices, Ms Lee might have done the sport more good than harm.

We will know for sure in four years.

If anything, we must not let this episode curb the way in which she intends to take table tennis forward.

Source : Straits Times - 01 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com

Thailand Samak strikes back

Thailand Samak strikes back

Thai PM attacks critics as Parliament, Senate meet to defuse crisis

By Nirmal Ghosh, Thailand Correspondent

BANGKOK: Thai Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej yesterday morning launched a blistering attack on his critics through his regular weekly radio talk, saying ‘They are dealing with a prime minister who is not easy to get rid of.
‘I’m not scared but I am worried about the harm that is being done to our nation.’

Later, as a few thousand pro-government supporters rallied at Sanam Luang and nearby Parliament, the House and the Senate began a joint session to discuss the crisis.

The latest round of protests, aimed at seeking the resignation of Mr Samak and his government, has seen the anti-government People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) occupy Government House and close down Phuket and Krabi airports, sending a shock to the tourism industry.

After two days of disruptions, flights to the two airports resumed yesterday. With deadlock persisting, the ruling coalition led by Mr Samak’s People Power Party (PPP), is essentially following due process and the rule book after being stymied in trying to dislodge protesters from Government House. The joint session was mooted as the proper forum for an elected parliament to address the crisis. But the situation seems to be settling into a stalemate.

Possible scenarios include a police crackdown, military intervention, or a snap election.

In the event of a snap election though, Mr Samak’s People Power Party could win again but PAD could start its campaign all over again.

After the frantic manoeuvring of Friday and Saturday, yesterday was relatively calm as many awaited the outcome of the emergency session, which lasted well into the night.

PAD co-leader Sondhi Limthongkul, who with other PAD figures is the subject of an arrest warrant and has been holed up in Government House among his supporters to avoid arrest, postponed a briefing with foreign media saying he would rather wait for the outcome of the debate.

There were no police seen in the vicinity, where the PAD now has a completely free hand. The spectre of violence continues to be a key factor in the calculations of the major players in the deadlock - the government, the army, and the now quite openly provocative PAD.

Pro-government supporters from the ruling PPP’s upcountry strongholds have been trickling into Bangkok and congregating at Sanam Luang a short distance from Government House, with organisers saying they aim to eventually muster as many people as the PAD’s 30,000-odd.

In a separate development, Bangkok’s police commissioner, General Asawin Kwanmuang, seen by the administration as being soft on the PAD, was replaced with a deputy who is is expected to take a tougher line.

Gen Songkitti Jaggabatara was confirmed as the new Supreme Commander in the annual military reshuffle, with the most powerful post - that of army chief - remaining with Gen Anupong Paochinda.

The quick endorsement of the list by Mr Samak, who is also Defence Minister and did not alter a single recommendation by Gen Anupong who drew it up, was seen by many analysts as a quid pro quo for the army’s support, and evidence of Mr Samak’s good working relationship with the army chief.

Gen Anupong remains a potential key to resolving the crisis if it escalates into a violent confrontation between pro- and anti-government forces - a scenario that many Thais say seems more and more likely.

Source : Straits Times - 01 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com

Unite to take on the best, Singapore PM tells table tennis body

Unite to take on the best, Singapore PM tells table tennis body

Much to the delight of spectators, PM Lee and MPs like Mr Seng Han Thong (behind) made their entrance on bicycles at the PAP carnival at West Coast Park yesterday, in keeping with the theme of the event - sports, the environment and family. — ST PHOTO: SHAHRIYA YAHAYA

IT IS unfortunate that it happened, but he is glad it is resolved.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong responded to questions about the two- week saga over the Olympic-winning national table tennis team yesterday by urging the players and the Singapore Table Tennis Association (STTA) to work hard towards future success.

Answering questions on the sidelines of a PAP Community Foundation event at West Coast Park yesterday, he said: ‘It’s a most unfortunate story. I’m glad it’s resolved.

‘I hope they will look forward and concentrate on building up the team, training and working together, to continue to do well for Singapore.’

In the Olympics men’s singles event on Aug 21, Singapore No. 1 Gao Ning played without a coach by his side and lost to a lower-ranked player. The fiasco led to doubts over the future of head coach Liu Guodong, who guided the team to Singapore’s first Olympic silver medal in 48 years.

Initially, STTA president Lee Bee Wah said that Liu’s fate would be decided by a coaching committee and that team manager Antony Lee’s services would no longer be required after Aug 31. Her remarks sparked outrage among Singaporeans.

After Team Singapore returned from Beijing last Monday, Sports Minister Vivian Balakrishnan promised a full review of the controversy. Last Friday, the matter came to a close following Ms Lee’s apology to the nation.

The Prime Minister stressed that total commitment is vital if Singapore wants to be among the best in the world. ‘It’s very challenging to compete in table tennis. The world’s best are very, very good,’ he said.

‘If we want to be anywhere near there, we have to have all our resources and all our efforts focused in the right direction.’

Thousands thronged the park yesterday for the PAP carnival.

Mr Lee and a host of ministers and MPs made their entrance on bicycles, much to the delight of the spectators.

He presented cheques totalling $664,000 to 17 welfare organisations, the result of fund-raising efforts by ministers and MPs in the North-West District. Fifty polytechnic students also received study awards totalling $100,000 from him.

He also lauded NTUC FairPrice for recognising former weightlifter Tan Howe Liang, 75. The supermarket chain gave the 1960 Olympic silver medallist a cheque for $10,000 on Saturday for winning Singapore’s first Olympic medal in Rome.

Mr Lee said: ‘I’m glad they did that. It’s a good gesture.

‘We remember him fondly because for 48 years, he was the one man who broke through and it has taken us a long time to equal his record.’

Source : Straits Times - 01 Sept 2008

Singapore Property - Buy, Sell, Rent, Invest

Mindy Yong

(+65)91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com

HDB Flat for Rent In Singapore - 01.09.2008

HDB Flat for Rent In Singapore - 01.09.2008

TYPE : [2]Rm [3]Rm [4]Rm [5]Rm [EA]Ex Apt [EM]Ex Mais [6]Rm

TNR=Tenure, DT=District, BDRM=Bedroom, AREA=Built-In, STR=Storey, Price $K=In Thousand

Price are subject to changes, please call (+65) 91002985 for lastest update

TYPE  —  2
District  —  7
ESTATE  —  BEACH RD, BLK 3 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  1
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  3
District  —  2
ESTATE  —  TG PAGAR PLAZA, BLK 4 #15
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  3
District  —  3
ESTATE  —  C’WEALTH DR, BLK 65 #07
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  1
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2400
TYPE  —  3
District  —  3
ESTATE  —  C’WEALTH DR, BLK 80 #07
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  3
District  —  3
ESTATE  —  STIRLING RD, BLK 169 #14
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  3
District  —  4
ESTATE  —  TELOK BLANGAH, BLK 28 #13
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  3
District  —  4
ESTATE  —  TELOK BLANGAH, BLK 33 #04
AREA  —  800
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  0
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  3
District  —  4
ESTATE  —  TELOK BLANGAH, BLK 45 #03
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1200
TYPE  —  3
District  —  10
ESTATE  —  EMPRESS RD, BLK 8 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  3
District  —  10
ESTATE  —  GHIM MOH RD, BLK 11 #20
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  3
District  —  10
ESTATE  —  GHIM MOH RD, BLK 6 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  3
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  KIM KEAT AVE, BLK 195 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  3
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  WHAMPOA DR, BLK 82 #05 BELOW
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  3
District  —  14
ESTATE  —  ALJUNIED CRES, BLK 98 #10 ABOVE
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  3
District  —  14
ESTATE  —  UBI, BLK 304 #02
AREA  —  850
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  1.94
PRICE$  —  1650
TYPE  —  3
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK NTH, BLK 548 #08
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  3
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK RESERVOIR, BLK 631 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  3
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK STH, BLK 25 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  3
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  CHAI CHEE, BLK 55 #01
AREA  —  1000
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  2
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  3
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  NEW UP CHANGI, BLK 59 #02
AREA  —  850
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  2.71
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  3
District  —  20
ESTATE  —  ANG MO KIO, BLK 504 #05-ABV
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  1
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  3
District  —  20
ESTATE  —  SIN MING, BLK 406 #13
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1950
TYPE  —  3
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  JURONG WEST, BLK 498 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  3
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  BT BATOK, BLK 213 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2400
TYPE  —  3
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  BT BATOK, BLK 534 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  3
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  SEGAR RD, BLK 471 #02-
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  1
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  3
District  —  25
ESTATE  —  MARSILING RD, BLK 136 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  3
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  YISHUN, BLK 320 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1900
TYPE  —  3
District  —  28
ESTATE  —  FERNVALE RD, BLK 436D #17
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  1
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  3A
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  CHAI CHEE, BLK 59 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  3N
District  —  5
ESTATE  —  CLEMENTI, BLK 322 #08
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  1
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2400
TYPE  —  3S
District  —  13
ESTATE  —  CIRCUIT RD, BLK 43 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1900
TYPE  —  4
District  —  8
ESTATE  —  BUFFALO RD, BLK 661 #16
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  4
District  —  8
ESTATE  —  OWEN RD, BLK 46 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  4
District  —  10
ESTATE  —  HOLLAND DR, BLK 13 #18
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  4
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  KIM KEAT, BLK 256 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2600
TYPE  —  4
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  ST GEORGE’S RD, BLK 19 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2100
TYPE  —  4
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  TOA PAYOH, BLK 79 #32
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  3000
TYPE  —  4
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  TOWNER RD, BLK 107 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  4
District  —  14
ESTATE  —  LENGKONG TIGA, BLK 109 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2400
TYPE  —  4
District  —  15
ESTATE  —  MARINE DR, BLK 74 #11
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  4
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK STH, BLK 37 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  4
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK STH, BLK 41 #03
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  4
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  TAMPINES, BLK 477 #01-
AREA  —  1152
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  1.74
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  4
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  TAMPINES, BLK 864A #11
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1900
TYPE  —  4
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  ANCHORVALE LANE, BLK 311D #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  4
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  RIVERVALE DR, BLK 193 #03
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  4
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  SERANGOON, BLK 219 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  4
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  SERANGOON, BLK 411 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  4
District  —  20
ESTATE  —  BISHAN, BLK 126 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  4
District  —  20
ESTATE  —  BISHAN, BLK 259 #03
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1500
TYPE  —  4
District  —  20
ESTATE  —  SHUNFU RD, BLK 305 #05
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2100
TYPE  —  4
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  JURONG EAST, BLK 228 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  4
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  YONG AN RD, BLK 357 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  4
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  BT PANJANG, BLK 450 #15
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  4
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 406 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1900
TYPE  —  4
District  —  25
ESTATE  —  WOODLANDS, BLK 744 #05
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  4
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  SEMBAWANG DR, BLK 466D #15
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  4
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  YISHUN, BLK 214 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  4
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  YISHUN, BLK 236 #01
AREA  —  915
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  1.97
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  4A
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 740 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2600
TYPE  —  4A
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  TAMPINES, BLK 422 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  1
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1800
TYPE  —  4A
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  HOUGANG, BLK 160 #14
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  4A
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  HOUGANG, BLK 239 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  4A
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  HOUGANG, BLK 650 #05
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  4A
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  HOUGANG, BLK 931 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2100
TYPE  —  4A
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  BT BATOK, BLK 298 #05
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1950
TYPE  —  4N
District  —  14
ESTATE  —  EUNOS CRES, BLK 10 #15
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  4N
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK RESERVOIR, BLK 706 #10
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  4N
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  YISHUN, BLK 637A #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  5
District  —  3
ESTATE  —  DELTA AVE, BLK 2 #19
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  3500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  5
ESTATE  —  WEST COAST RD, BLK 516 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  5
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  BOON KENG RD, BLK 5 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2700
TYPE  —  5
District  —  12
ESTATE  —  WHAMPOA RD, BLK 109 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2700
TYPE  —  5
District  —  14
ESTATE  —  EUNOS CRES, BLK 23 #08
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2800
TYPE  —  5
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK STH, BLK 66 #22
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2800
TYPE  —  5
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  CHAI CHEE, BLK 51 #14
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  5
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 117 #11
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  5
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 412 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 511 #10
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  5
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 512 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  5
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 740 #09
AREA  —  1378
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  2.03
PRICE$  —  2800
TYPE  —  5
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 771 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2400
TYPE  —  5
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  COMPASSVALE WLK, BLK 224B #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  PUNGGOL CTRL, BLK 299 #05
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  5
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  PUNGGOL FIELD, BLK 173B #08
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1900
TYPE  —  5
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  PUNGGOL FIELD, BLK 197B #10
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  5
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  SERANGOON, BLK 139 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2100
TYPE  —  5
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  SERANGOON, BLK 212 #03
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  1500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  SERANGOON, BLK 213 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  JURONG EAST, BLK 111 #18
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2800
TYPE  —  5
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  JURONG WEST, BLK 636 #15
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  TOH GUAN RD, BLK 277 #16
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  5
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  BT PANJANG, BLK 450 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  5
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  BT PANJANG, BLK 615 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  5
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 787 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  25
ESTATE  —  WOODLANDS, BLK 352 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  5
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  MONTREAL DR, BLK 588C #11
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  5
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  YISHUN, BLK 775 #13
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  5A
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 423 #08
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2600
TYPE  —  5A
District  —  20
ESTATE  —  ANG MO KIO, BLK 234 #03
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  5A
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  JURONG WEST, BLK 818 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  5I
District  —  3
ESTATE  —  DELTA AVE, BLK 1 #19
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2800
TYPE  —  5I
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 106 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2800
TYPE  —  5I
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  PANDAN GDNS, BLK 405 #07
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  5I
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 664 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  5I
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  MONTREAL DR, BLK 504A #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  2
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  0
TYPE  —  6
District  —  25
ESTATE  —  MARSILING RISE, BLK 115 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2600
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 154 #05
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2400
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 210 #03
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 245 #07
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 532 #07
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  3000
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 582 #03
AREA  —  1592
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  1.73
PRICE$  —  2750
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  PASIR RIS, BLK 715 #02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  21
ESTATE  —  TOH YI DR, BLK 7 #03
AREA  —  1570
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  1.85
PRICE$  —  2900
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  TOH GUAN, BLK 285D #16
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2600
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  CHOA CHU KANG, BLK 559 #07
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2200
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  23
ESTATE  —  PENDING RD, BLK 124 #09-02
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  EA
District  —  27
ESTATE  —  SEMBAWANG DR, BLK 467 #14
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  4
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2300
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK RESERVOIR, BLK 115 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2800
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  16
ESTATE  —  BEDOK RESERVOIR, BLK 115 #04
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  3000
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  18
ESTATE  —  TAMPINES, BLK 893 #09
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  HOUGANG, BLK 233 #01
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  HOUGANG, BLK 522 #06
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  19
ESTATE  —  LOR AH SOO, BLK 132 #12
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2000
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  20
ESTATE  —  BISHAN, BLK 186 #11
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2700
TYPE  —  EM
District  —  22
ESTATE  —  JURONG WEST, BLK 547 #08
AREA  —  0
AGE  —  
Bedroom  —  3
PSF  —  null
PRICE$  —  2500

 
Buy, Sell, Rent, invest, In Singapore
Mindy Yong

(+65) 91002985

mindy@mindyyong.com